On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:55:07PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > In short, we have to update the selinux policy for Fedora. (Fwiw, went > through the same excercise with nsfs back then.) > > I've created a pull-request here: > > https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/2050 > > and filed an issue here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265630 > > We have sufficient time to get this resolved and I was assured that this > would be resolved. If we can't get it resolved in a timely manner we'll > default to N for a while until everything's updated but I'd like to > avoid that. I'll track that issue. So you are basically saying that for now it is ok to break everybody's system who tries linux-next and let them bisect, just to figure out they have to disable a config option? To me this is a clear indication that the default is wrong already now.
