Re: [fuse-devel] Proxmox + NFS w/ exported FUSE = EIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2/19/24 20:58, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 20:55, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/19/24 20:38, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 20:05, Antonio SJ Musumeci <trapexit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is what I see from the kernel:
>>>>
>>>> lookup(nodeid=3, name=.);
>>>> lookup(nodeid=3, name=..);
>>>> lookup(nodeid=1, name=dir2);
>>>> lookup(nodeid=1, name=..);
>>>> forget(nodeid=3);
>>>> forget(nodeid=1);
>>>
>>> This is really weird.  It's a kernel bug, no arguments, because kernel
>>> should never send a forget against the root inode.   But that
>>> lookup(nodeid=1, name=..); already looks bogus.
>>
>> Why exactly bogus?
>>
>> reconnect_path()
>>                 if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
>>                         parent = reconnect_one(mnt, dentry, nbuf);
> 
> It's only getting this far if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED),
> but that doesn't make sense on the root dentry.  It does happen,
> though, I'm just not seeing yet how.

I see the BUG_ON(), but on the other the "if IS_ROOT(dentry)" condition
triggers.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux