On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:51:37AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 16:51 +1000, npiggin@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > +/* This should be called _only_ with a lock pinning the dentry */
> > +static inline struct dentry * __dget_locked_dlock(struct dentry
> > *dentry)
> > +{
> > + dentry->d_count++;
> > + dentry_lru_del_init(dentry);
> > + return dentry;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct dentry * __dget_locked(struct dentry *dentry)
> > +{
>
> Could you run your series through checkpatch, and clean up at least any
> errors you find..
Sure, I'll try to remember to do that at some point. fs/ code has a lot of
space after *, which I don't always fix up (and arguably is a clearer way
write pointer types). But yeah I'm happy to follow checkpatch style.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
