In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is: VAR + value < VAR Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3], or pointer[4] types. Refactor open-coded wrap-around addition test to use add_would_overflow(). This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future. Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4] Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/remap_range.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/remap_range.c b/fs/remap_range.c index f8c1120b8311..15e91bf2c5e3 100644 --- a/fs/remap_range.c +++ b/fs/remap_range.c @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int generic_remap_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, return -EINVAL; /* Ensure offsets don't wrap. */ - if (pos_in + count < pos_in || pos_out + count < pos_out) + if (add_would_overflow(pos_in, count) || add_would_overflow(pos_out, count)) return -EINVAL; size_in = i_size_read(inode_in); -- 2.34.1
