In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is: VAR + value < VAR Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer types, which the kernel works around by using the -fno-strict-overflow option in the build[1] (which used to just be -fwrapv). Regardless, we want to get the kernel source to the position where we can meaningfully instrument arithmetic wrap-around conditions and catch them when they are unexpected, regardless of whether they are signed[2], unsigned[3], or pointer[4] types. Refactor open-coded unsigned wrap-around addition test to use check_add_overflow(), retaining the result for later usage (which removes the redundant open-coded addition). This paves the way to enabling the wrap-around sanitizers in the future. Link: https://git.kernel.org/linus/68df3755e383e6fecf2354a67b08f92f18536594 [1] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/26 [2] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/27 [3] Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/344 [4] Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/read_write.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c index d4c036e82b6c..e24b94a8937d 100644 --- a/fs/read_write.c +++ b/fs/read_write.c @@ -1417,6 +1417,7 @@ static int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, struct inode *inode_out = file_inode(file_out); uint64_t count = *req_count; loff_t size_in; + loff_t sum_in, sum_out; int ret; ret = generic_file_rw_checks(file_in, file_out); @@ -1451,7 +1452,8 @@ static int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, return -ETXTBSY; /* Ensure offsets don't wrap. */ - if (pos_in + count < pos_in || pos_out + count < pos_out) + if (check_add_overflow(pos_in, count, &sum_in) || + check_add_overflow(pos_out, count, &sum_out)) return -EOVERFLOW; /* Shorten the copy to EOF */ @@ -1467,8 +1469,8 @@ static int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, /* Don't allow overlapped copying within the same file. */ if (inode_in == inode_out && - pos_out + count > pos_in && - pos_out < pos_in + count) + sum_out > pos_in && + pos_out < sum_in) return -EINVAL; *req_count = count; -- 2.34.1
