I'll send these first three patches for the next merge window (next
week). You can remove them in the next series.
Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 04:51:15PM +0100, Günther Noack wrote:
> This call is now going through a function pointer,
> and it is not as obvious any more that it will be inlined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/landlock/ruleset.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> index 789c81b26a50..e0a5fbf9201a 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> @@ -723,11 +723,12 @@ landlock_init_layer_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> /* Saves all handled accesses per layer. */
> for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++) {
> const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
> + const access_mask_t access_mask =
> + get_access_mask(domain, layer_level);
> unsigned long access_bit;
>
> for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req, num_access) {
> - if (BIT_ULL(access_bit) &
> - get_access_mask(domain, layer_level)) {
> + if (BIT_ULL(access_bit) & access_mask) {
> (*layer_masks)[access_bit] |=
> BIT_ULL(layer_level);
> handled_accesses |= BIT_ULL(access_bit);
> --
> 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
>
>
