Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] IOMMU memory observability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 02:12:26PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, we will have a difference between GFP_ACCOUNT and what
> NR_IOMMU_PAGES shows. GFP_ACCOUNT is set only where it makes sense to
> charge to user processes, i.e. IOMMU Page Tables, but there more IOMMU
> shared data that should not really be charged to a specific process.

I see. I'd suggest adding this explanation to commit 10/10 message
(perhaps with some ballpark numbers of pages). In order to have a
reference and understadning if someone decided to charge (and limit) all
in the future.

Thanks,
Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux