On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 9:55 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 09:44:27AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:05 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Saves a pointer per struct dentry and actually makes the things less > > > clumsy. Cleaned the d_walk() and dcache_readdir() a bit by use > > > of hlist_for_... iterators. > > > > > > A couple of new helpers - d_first_child() and d_next_sibling(), > > > to make the expressions less awful. > > > > > > X-fuck-kABI: gladly > > > > ??? > > It breaks kABI. Hard. For a good reason. And if you need an elaboration > of the reasons why kABI is, er, not universally liked - let's take it > to private email. Some rants are really too unprintable for maillists... I don't mind rants, even quite fond of yours :) But "X-fuck-kABI: gladly" serves no real value. You'd already documented the kAPI change in porting.rst. If you want to add a note about kABI, I suggest that you add it there. Thanks, Amir.
