On 10/31/23, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The follow up including a statement about "being arsed" once more was >> to Christian, not you and was rather "tongue in cheek". > > Fyi, I can't be arsed to be talked to like that. > Maybe there is a language or cultural barrier at play here and the above comes off to you as inflammatory. I assumed the tone here is rather informal. For example here is an excerpt from your response to me in another thread: > You're all driving me nuts. ;) I assumed this was not a serious statement and the "being arsed" thing was written by me in the same spirit. I find it surprising there is a strong reaction to it, but I can only explain why. All that said, I have some patches I intend to submit in the foreseeable future. I am going to make sure to stick to more professional tone. >> Whether the patch is ready for reviews and whatnot is your call to >> make as the author. > > This is basically why that patch never staid in -next. Dave said this > patch is meaningless without his other patchs and I had no reason to > doubt that claim nor currently the cycles to benchmark and disprove it. > That makes sense, thanks. -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
