Re: default ext3 journal mode - time to poke at this again?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/20/2009 02:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
   Hi,

At the linux symposium this week, some of us were wondering when it
would be safe to try and default ext3's default journal mode back to
sanity given that all (?) distros immediately reverted the default to
data writeback mode.
   Well, at least SUSE still uses data=ordered,barrier as a default (and
I personally think this is the right thing to do). Hmm, maybe you've
meant this and just wrote it otherwise given your paragraph below ;)

Definitely what I meant to post - Fedora and RHEL both use ordered mode as a default as well. Not many fs developers are fans of data writeback mode as far as I can tell...

Failing that, can we at least clean up the config option description to
properly give the normal users a non-bogus, technical description of the
trade off ?
   Yes, I'm all for it. Will you try to write up something or should I?

									Honza

I posted something (from rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx) earlier today and we had a discussion about this on the ext4 call. I think that Ted will try to update the text that I proposed over the next couple of days.

I think that Chris will be reposting his data guarded mode patches soon as well, so we might be able to move forward quickly :-)

ric


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux