Re: [External] [PATCH v13 08/10] fuse: update inode size/mtime after passthrough write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:31 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 9/25/23 4:43 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Jens,
> >
> > Are there any IOCB flags that overlayfs (or backing_aio) need
> > to set or clear, besides IOCB_DIO_CALLER_COMP, that
> > would prevent calling completion from interrupt context?
>
> There are a few flags that may get set (like WAITQ or ALLOC_CACHE), but
> I think that should all work ok as-is as the former is just state in
> that iocb and that is persistent (and only for the read path), and
> ALLOC_CACHE should just be propagated.
>
> > Or is the proper way to deal with this is to defer completion
> > to workqueue in the common backing_aio helpers that
> > I am re-factoring from overlayfs?
>
> No, deferring to a workqueue would defeat the purpose of the flag, which
> is telling you that the caller will ensure that the end_io callback will
> happen from task context and need not be deferred to a workqueue. I can
> take a peek at how to wire it up properly for overlayfs, have some
> travel coming up in a few days.
>

No worries, this is not urgent.
I queued a change to overlayfs to take a spin lock on completion
for the 6.7 merge window, so if I can get a ACK/NACK until then
It would be nice.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230912173653.3317828-2-amir73il@xxxxxxxxx/

> > IIUC, that could also help overlayfs support
> > IOCB_DIO_CALLER_COMP?
> >
> > Is my understanding correct?
>
> If you peek at fs.h and find the CALLER_COMP references, it'll tell you
> a bit about how it works. This is new with the 6.6-rc kernel, there's a
> series of patches from me that went in through the iomap tree that
> hooked that up. Those commits have an explanation as well.
>

Sorry, I think my question wasn't clear.
I wasn't asking specifically about CALLER_COMP.

Zhang Tianci commented in review (above) that I am not allowed
to take the inode spinlock in the ovl io completion context, because
it may be called from interrupt.

I wasn't sure if his statement was correct, so this is what I am
asking - whether overlayfs can set any IOCB flags that will force
the completion to be called from task context - this is kind of the
opposite of CALLER_COMP.

Let me know if I wasn't able to explain myself.
I am not that fluent in aio jargon.

Thanks,
Amir.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux