Re: [External] [PATCH v13 08/10] fuse: update inode size/mtime after passthrough write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 8:59 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Similar to update size/mtime at the end of fuse_perform_write(),
> we need to bump the attr version when we update the inode size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/fuse/passthrough.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
> index 10b370bcc423..8352d6b91e0e 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/passthrough.c
> @@ -14,15 +14,42 @@ struct fuse_aio_req {
>         struct kiocb *iocb_fuse;
>  };
>
> -static void fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(struct fuse_aio_req *aio_req)
> +static void fuse_file_start_write(struct file *fuse_file,
> +                                 struct file *backing_file,
> +                                 loff_t pos, size_t count)
> +{
> +       struct inode *inode = file_inode(fuse_file);
> +       struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +
> +       if (inode->i_size < pos + count)
> +               set_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
> +
> +       file_start_write(backing_file);
> +}
> +
> +static void fuse_file_end_write(struct file *fuse_file,
> +                               struct file *backing_file,
> +                               loff_t pos, ssize_t res)
> +{
> +       struct inode *inode = file_inode(fuse_file);
> +       struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
> +
> +       file_end_write(backing_file);
> +
> +       fuse_write_update_attr(inode, pos, res);

Hi Amir,
This function(fuse_file_end_write) will execute in interrupt context, but
fuse_write_update_attr() uses fuse_inode->lock, this will cause soft lockup.

So we may have to change all the fuse_inode->lock usage to fixup this bug, but
I think this is one ugly resolution.

Or why should we do aio_clearup_handler()? What is the difference between
fuse_passthrough_write_iter() with ovl_write_iter()?

Thanks,
Tianci

> +       clear_bit(FUSE_I_SIZE_UNSTABLE, &fi->state);
> +}
> +
> +static void fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(struct fuse_aio_req *aio_req, long res)
>  {
>         struct kiocb *iocb = &aio_req->iocb;
>         struct kiocb *iocb_fuse = aio_req->iocb_fuse;
> +       struct file *filp = iocb->ki_filp;
> +       struct file *fuse_filp = iocb_fuse->ki_filp;
>
>         if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WRITE) {
> -               __sb_writers_acquired(file_inode(iocb->ki_filp)->i_sb,
> -                                     SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
> -               file_end_write(iocb->ki_filp);
> +               __sb_writers_acquired(file_inode(filp)->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
> +               fuse_file_end_write(fuse_filp, filp, iocb->ki_pos, res);
>         }
>
>         iocb_fuse->ki_pos = iocb->ki_pos;
> @@ -35,7 +62,7 @@ static void fuse_aio_rw_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long res)
>                 container_of(iocb, struct fuse_aio_req, iocb);
>         struct kiocb *iocb_fuse = aio_req->iocb_fuse;
>
> -       fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(aio_req);
> +       fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(aio_req, res);
>         iocb_fuse->ki_complete(iocb_fuse, res);
>  }
>
> @@ -71,7 +98,7 @@ ssize_t fuse_passthrough_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb_fuse,
>                 aio_req->iocb.ki_complete = fuse_aio_rw_complete;
>                 ret = call_read_iter(passthrough_filp, &aio_req->iocb, iter);
>                 if (ret != -EIOCBQUEUED)
> -                       fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(aio_req);
> +                       fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(aio_req, ret);
>         }
>  out:
>         revert_creds(old_cred);
> @@ -87,22 +114,25 @@ ssize_t fuse_passthrough_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb_fuse,
>         struct inode *fuse_inode = file_inode(fuse_filp);
>         struct file *passthrough_filp = ff->passthrough->filp;
>         struct inode *passthrough_inode = file_inode(passthrough_filp);
> +       size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
>         const struct cred *old_cred;
>         ssize_t ret;
>         rwf_t rwf;
>
> -       if (!iov_iter_count(iter))
> +       if (!count)
>                 return 0;
>
>         inode_lock(fuse_inode);
>
>         old_cred = override_creds(ff->passthrough->cred);
>         if (is_sync_kiocb(iocb_fuse)) {
> -               file_start_write(passthrough_filp);
> +               fuse_file_start_write(fuse_filp, passthrough_filp,
> +                                     iocb_fuse->ki_pos, count);
>                 rwf = iocb_to_rw_flags(iocb_fuse->ki_flags, FUSE_IOCB_MASK);
>                 ret = vfs_iter_write(passthrough_filp, iter, &iocb_fuse->ki_pos,
>                                      rwf);
> -               file_end_write(passthrough_filp);
> +               fuse_file_end_write(fuse_filp, passthrough_filp,
> +                                   iocb_fuse->ki_pos, ret);
>         } else {
>                 struct fuse_aio_req *aio_req;
>
> @@ -112,7 +142,8 @@ ssize_t fuse_passthrough_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb_fuse,
>                         goto out;
>                 }
>
> -               file_start_write(passthrough_filp);
> +               fuse_file_start_write(fuse_filp, passthrough_filp,
> +                                     iocb_fuse->ki_pos, count);
>                 __sb_writers_release(passthrough_inode->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
>
>                 aio_req->iocb_fuse = iocb_fuse;
> @@ -120,7 +151,7 @@ ssize_t fuse_passthrough_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb_fuse,
>                 aio_req->iocb.ki_complete = fuse_aio_rw_complete;
>                 ret = call_write_iter(passthrough_filp, &aio_req->iocb, iter);
>                 if (ret != -EIOCBQUEUED)
> -                       fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(aio_req);
> +                       fuse_aio_cleanup_handler(aio_req, ret);
>         }
>  out:
>         revert_creds(old_cred);
> --
> 2.34.1
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux