Re: [PATCH 00/13] Pass data temperature information to zoned UFS devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/21, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:39:00PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 9/21/23 12:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 07:27:08AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > On 9/21/23 00:46, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > > > > Should NVMe streams be brought back? Yes? No?
> > > > 
> > > > From commit 561593a048d7 ("Merge tag 'for-5.18/write-streams-2022-03-18'
> > > > of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block"): "This removes the write streams
> > > > support in NVMe. No vendor ever really shipped working support for this,
> > > > and they are not interested in supporting it."
> > > 
> > > It sounds like UFS is at the same stage that NVMe got to -- standard
> > > exists, no vendor has committed to actually shipping it.  Isn't bringing
> > > it back a little premature?
> > 
> > Hi Matthew,
> > 
> > That's a misunderstanding. UFS vendors support interpreting the SCSI GROUP
> > NUMBER as a data temperature since many years, probably since more than ten
> > years. Additionally, for multiple UFS vendors having the data temperature
> > available is important for achieving good performance. This message shows
> > how UFS vendors were using that information before write hint support was
> > removed: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/PH0PR08MB7889642784B2E1FC1799A828DB0B9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> If vendor support already exists, then why did you dodge the question
> asking for quantified data that I asked earlier?  And can we have that
> data now?

I'm in doubt this patch-set really requires the quantified data which may be
mostly confidential to all the companies, also given the revert reason was no
user, IIUC. OTOH, I'm not sure whether you're famailiar with FTL, but, when
we consider the entire stack ranging from f2fs to FTL which manages NAND blocks,
I do see a clear benefit to give the temperature hints for FTL to align therein
garbage collection unit with one in f2fs, which is the key idea on Zoned UFS
in mobile world, I believe. Otherwise, it can show non-deterministic longer
write latencies due to internal GCs, increase WAI feeding to shorter lifetime.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux