Re: [MAINTAINERS/KERNEL SUMMIT] Trust and maintenance of file systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 18 Sept 2023 at 12:32, Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I am afraid this is not reflecting reality.
>
> I am pretty sure that "give me that document on a USB stick, and I'll take
> a look" leads to using things like libreoffice (or any other editor liked
> by general public) to open the file directly on the FAT USB stick. And
> that's pretty much guaranteed to use mmap().

Ugh. I would have hoped that anybody will fall back to read/write -
because we definitely have filesystems that don't support mmap.

But I guess they are so specialized as to not ever trigger that kind
of problem (eg /proc - nobody is putting office documents there ;)

A cache-incoherent MAP_PRIVATE only mmap (ie one that doesn't react to
'write()' changing the data) is easy to do, but yeah, it would still
be a lot more work than just "keep things as-is".

           Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux