Re: [PATCH] Added CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:42:39 +1000
tridge@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi Alan,
> 
>  > > There really was no such thing as "vfat" anyway.  VFAT in the Windows
>  > 
>  > In the eyes of the end user there is such a thing as vfat. This is about
>  > expectations not technical issues.
> 
> Do you have an example of an end user device that would be affected by
> this change, and which is never distributed in any of the countries
> where a varient of this patent exists?

You gave one: Microsoft Windows XP. Risk of very rare system crashes.

Thats enough in a high reliability environment to require the file system
in question is banned from use site wide at may locations. Can't have a
flash card bringing down a windows dependant US destroyer can they.

Getting "not vfat" by suprise is thus really really bad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux