Hi Alan, > > There really was no such thing as "vfat" anyway. VFAT in the Windows > > In the eyes of the end user there is such a thing as vfat. This is about > expectations not technical issues. Do you have an example of an end user device that would be affected by this change, and which is never distributed in any of the countries where a varient of this patent exists? > From the funnies we've had in the past with FAT my gut impression is > there are only a few implementations out there. Psion seems to have their > own but most of the rest behave remarkably similarly which makes me > suspect they all licensed a tiny number of implementations (DRDOS one > perhaps ?). Do you happen to have a Psion and/or DRDOS based device in your collection of toys so you can test with the proposed patch and see if there are any problems? Apart from Windows varients and MacOSX I have also tested on the following mobile phones (via a microSD card): Samsumg SGH-E250 Nokia 6120 They both worked fine with long filename images saved on a Linux system with this patch. I don't know what OSes these phones are based on. Maybe you could test on the various devices with removable media you have and see how it goes? Cheers, Tridge -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
