On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 09:53:27PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Anyway, what about just having read-only be the minimum for supporting a > file system? We can say "sorry, due to no one maintaining this file system, > we will no longer allow write access." But I'm guessing that just > supporting reading an old file system is much easier than modifying one > (wasn't that what we did with NTFS for the longest time?) read-only is just as annoying, because all our normal test infrastruture doesn't work for that at all. So you'd need not only a test harness for that, but also a lot of publically shared images and/or a tool to generate filled images.
