On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 08:54:38 +1000 Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And let's not forget: removing a filesystem from the kernel is not > removing end user support for extracting data from old filesystems. > We have VMs for that - we can run pretty much any kernel ever built > inside a VM, so users that need to extract data from a really old > filesystem we no longer support in a modern kernel can simply boot > up an old distro that did support it and extract the data that way. Of course there's the case of trying to recreate a OS that can run on a very old kernel. Just building an old kernel is difficult today because today's compilers will refuse to build them (I've hit issues in bisections because of that!) You could argue that you could just install an old OS into the VM, but that too requires access to that old OS. Anyway, what about just having read-only be the minimum for supporting a file system? We can say "sorry, due to no one maintaining this file system, we will no longer allow write access." But I'm guessing that just supporting reading an old file system is much easier than modifying one (wasn't that what we did with NTFS for the longest time?) -- Steve
