On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:41:04PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:57:02PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 01:46:20PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > > Something like the following might already be enough (IT'S A DRAFT, AND > > > > UNTESTED, AND PROBABLY BROKEN)? > > > > > > It's probably the right thing conceptually, but it will also need > > > the SB_I_RETIRED from test_bdev_super_fc or even just reuse > > > test_bdev_super_fc after that's been renamed to be more generic. > > > > I'll rename it and use it. Let me send a patch. > > Hmkay, how does that look? I think this is a fairly acceptable change > and looks better than the mtd special-test/set-sauce we currently have: Looks sensibe to me, but please run it past the MTD maintainers.
