On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:51:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 01:46:20PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Something like the following might already be enough (IT'S A DRAFT, AND > > UNTESTED, AND PROBABLY BROKEN)? > > It's probably the right thing conceptually, but it will also need > the SB_I_RETIRED from test_bdev_super_fc or even just reuse > test_bdev_super_fc after that's been renamed to be more generic. I'll rename it and use it. Let me send a patch.
