Re: [PATCH 4/5] [RFC] fuse: Set and use IOCB_DIRECT when FOPEN_DIRECT_IO is set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 22:03, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/28/23 13:59, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Also could we make the function names of fuse_direct_IO() and
> > fuse_direct_io() less similar, as this is a very annoying (though
> > minor) issue.
>
> What about _fuse_do_direct_io()? '_' to mark that it is a follow up and
> 'do' that it initiates the transfer? Or maybe just '_fuse_direct_io'? Or
> 'fuse_send_dio'?

I'd prefer a non-underscore variant.  fuse_send_dio() sounds good.

Thanks,
Miklos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux