Re: [PATCH 4/5] [RFC] fuse: Set and use IOCB_DIRECT when FOPEN_DIRECT_IO is set

[Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/28/23 13:59, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Also could we make the function names of fuse_direct_IO() and
> fuse_direct_io() less similar, as this is a very annoying (though
> minor) issue.

What about _fuse_do_direct_io()? '_' to mark that it is a follow up and 
'do' that it initiates the transfer? Or maybe just '_fuse_direct_io'? Or 
'fuse_send_dio'?


Thanks,
Bernd