Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()

[linke li <lilinke99@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for your reply.
> This certainly fixes the problem, but wouldn't it be easier to get the
> compiler to do the work for us?
 I don't know which solution is better, but it does avoid this problem.
Like
    tz = (int)(signed char)p[6];