Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()
From: linke li <lilinke99@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:10:29 +0800
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Linke Li <lilinke99@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <63c6f039-4b33-cdfc-1e49-fc9fc35d513e@web.de>

Dear Markus,

Thank you for your valuable feedback, I apologize for my typo in the
description.

> How do you think about to add the tag “Fixes”?

I agree with that.

References:
- [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()
  - From: Linke Li

Prev by Date: Re: [syzbot] [f2fs?] possible deadlock in f2fs_getxattr
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v12 5/9] nvme: add copy offload support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] isofs: fix undefined behavior in iso_date()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux