On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:48:31PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:54:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > - Prereq patch series has been pruned down a bit more; also Mike > > Snitzer suggested putting those patches in their own branch: > > > > https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git/log/?h=bcachefs-prereqs > > > > "iov_iter: copy_folio_from_iter_atomic()" was dropped and replaced > > with willy's "iov_iter: Handle compound highmem pages in > > copy_page_from_iter_atomic()"; he said he'd try to send this for -rc4 > > since it's technically a bug fix; in the meantime, it'll be getting > > more testing from my users. > > > > The two lockdep patches have been dropped for now; the > > bcachefs-for-upstream branch is switched back to > > lockdep_set_novalidate_class() for btree node locks. > > > > six locks, mean and variance have been moved into fs/bcachefs/ for > > now; this means there's a new prereq patch to export > > osq_(lock|unlock) > > > > The remaining prereq patches are pretty trivial, with the exception > > of "block: Don't block on s_umount from __invalidate_super()". I > > would like to get a reviewed-by for that patch, and it wouldn't hurt > > for others. > > > > previously posting: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcachefs/20230509165657.1735798-1-kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx/T/#m34397a4d39f5988cc0b635e29f70a6170927746f > > Can you send these prereqs out again, with maintainers CCed > appropriately? (I think some feedback from the prior revision needs to > be addressed first, though. For example, __flatten already exists, etc.) Thanks for pointing that out, I knew it was in the pipeline :) Will do...
