On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:54:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > - Prereq patch series has been pruned down a bit more; also Mike > Snitzer suggested putting those patches in their own branch: > > https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git/log/?h=bcachefs-prereqs > > "iov_iter: copy_folio_from_iter_atomic()" was dropped and replaced > with willy's "iov_iter: Handle compound highmem pages in > copy_page_from_iter_atomic()"; he said he'd try to send this for -rc4 > since it's technically a bug fix; in the meantime, it'll be getting > more testing from my users. > > The two lockdep patches have been dropped for now; the > bcachefs-for-upstream branch is switched back to > lockdep_set_novalidate_class() for btree node locks. > > six locks, mean and variance have been moved into fs/bcachefs/ for > now; this means there's a new prereq patch to export > osq_(lock|unlock) > > The remaining prereq patches are pretty trivial, with the exception > of "block: Don't block on s_umount from __invalidate_super()". I > would like to get a reviewed-by for that patch, and it wouldn't hurt > for others. > > previously posting: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcachefs/20230509165657.1735798-1-kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx/T/#m34397a4d39f5988cc0b635e29f70a6170927746f Can you send these prereqs out again, with maintainers CCed appropriately? (I think some feedback from the prior revision needs to be addressed first, though. For example, __flatten already exists, etc.) -- Kees Cook
