On Wed 05-07-23 15:00:55, Jeff Layton wrote:
> In later patches, we're going to change how the inode's ctime field is
> used. Switch to using accessor functions instead of raw accesses of
> inode->i_ctime.
>
> Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Just one nit below:
> @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ void ceph_fill_file_time(struct inode *inode, int issued,
> struct timespec64 *mtime, struct timespec64 *atime)
> {
> struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> + struct timespec64 ictime = inode_get_ctime(inode);
> int warn = 0;
>
> if (issued & (CEPH_CAP_FILE_EXCL|
> @@ -696,11 +697,12 @@ void ceph_fill_file_time(struct inode *inode, int issued,
> CEPH_CAP_AUTH_EXCL|
> CEPH_CAP_XATTR_EXCL)) {
> if (ci->i_version == 0 ||
> - timespec64_compare(ctime, &inode->i_ctime) > 0) {
> + timespec64_compare(ctime, &ictime) > 0) {
> dout("ctime %lld.%09ld -> %lld.%09ld inc w/ cap\n",
> - inode->i_ctime.tv_sec, inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec,
> + inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_sec,
> + inode_get_ctime(inode).tv_nsec,
I think here you can use ictime instead of inode_get_ctime(inode).
Otherwise feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
