On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 9:11 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:08:37AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > Well, I am not sure if FMODE_FAKE_PATH in v3 is a better name, > > because you did rightfully say that "fake path" is not that descriptive, > > but I will think of a better way to describe "fake path" and match the > > flag to the file container name. > > I suspect the just claling it out what it is and naming it > FMODE_OVERLAYFS might be a good idea. We'd just need to make sure not > to set it for the cachefiles use case, which is probably a good idea > anyway. Agree to both. As I told Christian, I was reluctant to use the last available flag bit (although you did free up a couple of flags:)), but making FMODE_OVERLAYFS overlayfs only and keeping cachefiles with FMODE_NOACCOUNT would be the cleaner thing to do. Thanks, Amir.
