On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:08:37AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > Well, I am not sure if FMODE_FAKE_PATH in v3 is a better name, > because you did rightfully say that "fake path" is not that descriptive, > but I will think of a better way to describe "fake path" and match the > flag to the file container name. I suspect the just claling it out what it is and naming it FMODE_OVERLAYFS might be a good idea. We'd just need to make sure not to set it for the cachefiles use case, which is probably a good idea anyway.
