Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, May 28 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
That would be great, I would have no problem integrating such a feature.
It definitely makes sense.
Hi Al, Christoph,
unless you have objections against the whole idea, I wonder if
it would be possible to make the patches which wrap sb->s_dirt
usage go via VFS tree first, and then I'd continue the timer
optimization work separately. IMO, wrapping s_dirt makes sense
in general. I mean, patches 01-17 from this series.
That makese sense, those are totally separate from the actual
functionality.
Reminding ping.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
