On Thu, May 28 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: >> That would be great, I would have no problem integrating such a feature. >> It definitely makes sense. > > Hi Al, Christoph, > > unless you have objections against the whole idea, I wonder if > it would be possible to make the patches which wrap sb->s_dirt > usage go via VFS tree first, and then I'd continue the timer > optimization work separately. IMO, wrapping s_dirt makes sense > in general. I mean, patches 01-17 from this series. That makese sense, those are totally separate from the actual functionality. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
