On 13.04.23 12:40, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
We keep track of different types of reclaimed pages through
reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab, and we add them to the reported number
of reclaimed pages. For non-memcg reclaim, this makes sense. For memcg
reclaim, we have no clue if those pages are charged to the memcg under
reclaim.
Slab pages are shared by different memcgs, so a freed slab page may have
only been partially charged to the memcg under reclaim. The same goes for
clean file pages from pruned inodes (on highmem systems) or xfs buffer
pages, there is no simple way to currently link them to the memcg under
reclaim.
Stop reporting those freed pages as reclaimed pages during memcg reclaim.
This should make the return value of writing to memory.reclaim, and may
help reduce unnecessary reclaim retries during memcg charging. Writing to
memory.reclaim on the root memcg is considered as cgroup_reclaim(), but
for this case we want to include any freed pages, so use the
global_reclaim() check instead of !cgroup_reclaim().
Generally, this should make the return value of
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() more accurate. In some limited cases (e.g.
freed a slab page that was mostly charged to the memcg under reclaim),
the return value of try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() can be underestimated,
but this should be fine. The freed pages will be uncharged anyway, and we
can charge the memcg the next time around as we usually do memcg reclaim
in a retry loop.
Fixes: f2fe7b09a52b ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
instead of pages")
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
LGTM, hopefully the underestimation won't result in a real issue.
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
