Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This looks like it will do the right thing. We definitely _don't_ want > order-dependent option parsing. If we don't want order-dependent option parsing, then we really need to accumulate all the options in the kernel and only then fully parse/interpret them - and go through them at least twice where we know we may have options that retroactively affect other options:-/ I guess we can't kill off "sloppy" for the moment. David
