Re: [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v2.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joel Becker wrote:
>> So far I don't feel TOMOYO needs to introduce security_path_reflink() because
>> modifications after reflink() will be checked by other LSM hooks.
> 
> 	So I should change the path_reflink() call to path_link() in
> reflinkat(2)?

Yes, you can.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux