On Thu, 7 May 2009, Joel Becker wrote:
> @@ -1402,6 +1419,8 @@ struct security_operations {
> struct dentry *new_dentry);
> int (*path_rename) (struct path *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> struct path *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry);
> + int (*path_reflink) (struct dentry *old_dentry, struct path *new_dir,
> + struct dentry *new_dentry);
> #endif
>
The TOMOYO folk don't need a path hook, so it would be unused, and should
not be added unless someone responsible for an in-tree LSM establishes a
case for it.
> +int security_inode_reflink(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
> + struct dentry *new_dentry);
We don't need the new_dentry argument (this is correct in the low-level
hook, and doesn't compile with CONFIG_SECURITY=y).
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
