Re: [GIT PULL] acl updates for v6.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:26:41AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04.01.23 11:14, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Linux kernel regression tracking (#info) wrote:
> >> [TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
> >> tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
> >>
> >> On 04.01.23 01:57, hooanon05g@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> Christian Brauner:
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 12:27:55AM +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote:
> >>> 	:::
> >>>>> I've found a behaviour got changed from v6.1 to v6.2-rc1 on ext3 (ext4).
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey, I'll try to take a look before new years.
> >>>
> >>> Now it becomes clear that the problem was on my side.
> >>> The "acl updates for v6.2" in mainline has nothing to deal with it.
> >>> Sorry for the noise.
> >>
> >> In that case:
> >>
> >> #regzbot resolve: turns out it was a local problem and not regression in
> >> the kernel
> > 
> > When and how did regzbot start tracking this? None of the mails that
> > reported this issue to me contained any reference to regzbot.
> > 
> > If something is currently classified as a regression it'd be good to let
> > the responsible maintainers and developers know that.
> 
> That happens these days (again) -- since five, too be more precise, as I
> recently (again) changed how to handle that mails (some maintainers
> hated getting mails about adding reports to the tracking, but I recently
>  decided they have to deal with that locally).
> 
> But the mail that added this thread to the tracking was before that,
> sorry. :-/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2aa5cc7e-ca00-22a7-5e2f-7eb73556181e@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Ok, no problem. It's just odd because the mail you link here is a reply to
https://lore.kernel.org/all/29161.1672154875@jrobl
which has both mine and the original reporters mail address. Which means
a reply to it could've just kept all recipients which means that they
somehow must've been removed before it got sent.

Just in the future it would be great to be notified early when something
is classified as a regression.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux