Hello, Christian Brauner: > This series passes the LTP and xfstests suites without any regressions. For > xfstests the following combinations were tested: I've found a behaviour got changed from v6.1 to v6.2-rc1 on ext3 (ext4). ---------------------------------------- on v6.1 + ls -ld /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir drwxrwsr-x 2 nobody nogroup 1024 Dec 27 14:46 /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir + getfacl -d /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # file: dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # owner: nobody # group: nogroup # flags: -s- ---------------------------------------- on v6.2-rc1 + ls -ld /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir drwxrwsr-x+ 2 nobody nogroup 1024 Dec 27 23:51 /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir + getfacl -d /dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # file: dev/shm/rw/hd-test/newdir # owner: nobody # group: nogroup # flags: -s- user::rwx user:root:rwx group::r-x mask::rwx other::r-x ---------------------------------------- - in the output from 'ls -l', the extra '+' appears - in the output from 'getfacl -d', some lines are appended - in those lines, I am not sure whether 'user:root:rwx' is correct or not. Even it is correct, getfacl on v6.1 didn't produce such lines. Is this change intentional? In other words, is this patch series for a bugfix? J. R. Okajima
