On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:00:08PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 05 May 2009 08:35:27 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said: > > > http://books.google.com/books?id=6je0tPcGMzYC&pg=PT822&lpg=PT822&dq=Videotron > ics+v.+Bend+Electronics,+586+F.Supp.+478,+481+(D.+Nev.+1984)&source=bl&ots=ccxO > 5np_uQ&sig=Q0wj4k5uCpMiZybAQe12JlHhh0A&hl=en&ei=Z1kASu2ZJ8eLtgehupyNBw&sa=X&oi= > book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#PPT822,M1 > > > > Dated 2005, cites a 1988 case in footnote 28. Also claims that: > > That would be the same Neundorfer case I found. > > > Copyright Office II Compendium of Copyright Office Practices lists > > acceptable variants to the C in a circle, including "(c)". > > http://www.copyright.gov/compendium/ - I ain't seeing it in there anyplace? > Every occurrence of "(c)" is in either a USC or CFR citation. But of course > that only shows the two chapters modified since 1998. Yee-hah. :) Indeed! :-/ > I suspect it's one of those dark corners of the legal system that nobody > really wants to explore, because there might be a Balrog hiding in the depths > (sort of like the question "Which clause/theory of copyright law authorizes > the copy of a webpage you make while downloading it to read it?" ;) ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
