Re: [PATCH 0/6] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 05:33:33PM +0000, Clay Mayers wrote:
> > 
> > As long as the protocols don't provide proof-of-work, trying this
> > doesn't really prove anything with respect to this concern.
> 
> I'm out of my depth here, but isn't VERIFY tightly related to PI and
> at the heart of detecting SAN bit-rot? The proof of work can be via
> end-to-end data protection. VERIFY has to actually read to detect bad
> host generated PI guard/tags.  I'm assuming the PI checks can be
> disabled for WRITE and enabled for VERIFY as the test.

I suppose if you happen to have a PI formatted drive, you could WRITE
garbage Guard tags with PRCHK disabled, then see if VERIFY with PRCHK
enabled returns the Guard Check Error; but PI is an optional format
feature orthogonal to the VERIFY command: we can't count on that format
being available in most implementations.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux