On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:29:34AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > Sorry for the delay. Simpler might be just to drop and reacquire the > > mutex each time through nfsd4_list_rec_dir()'s loop, but I'd just as > > soon rework the called functions to expect the mutex be held (and get > > rid of the unused, probably fragile, clear_clid_dir() in the process). > > > > So the following could be folded in to your patch. > > > > I tested the combined patch over 2.6.30-rc2. I also tested 2.6.29 + > > 05f4f678 + the combined patch. Both look OK. Feel free to add a > > tested-by or acked-by for "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> as > > appropriate. Or happy to add a s-o-b and shepherd it along myself if > > it's easier.... > > I can take both, but if you prefer to have that one go through nfs tree - > fine by me. > > I'm going to push a queue into for-next in a couple of hours; running build > tests right now. Patch from dwmw2 is in there... However it makes it there is fine by me; I'll wait for one of you to take care of it. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
