> Sorry for the delay. Simpler might be just to drop and reacquire the > mutex each time through nfsd4_list_rec_dir()'s loop, but I'd just as > soon rework the called functions to expect the mutex be held (and get > rid of the unused, probably fragile, clear_clid_dir() in the process). > > So the following could be folded in to your patch. > > I tested the combined patch over 2.6.30-rc2. I also tested 2.6.29 + > 05f4f678 + the combined patch. Both look OK. Feel free to add a > tested-by or acked-by for "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> as > appropriate. Or happy to add a s-o-b and shepherd it along myself if > it's easier.... I can take both, but if you prefer to have that one go through nfs tree - fine by me. I'm going to push a queue into for-next in a couple of hours; running build tests right now. Patch from dwmw2 is in there... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
