Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well in theory I still think it would be cleanest to modify buffer to > play more nicely with it. But maybe that ends up being harder to > distinguish the 3 cases of attached metadata on the page. I don't know, > you haven't posted any isofs code so either way it is inappropriate to > use up this extra page flag here. > > Is isofs cache worth a page flag? Well, isofs was something I wanted at the time. Besides, as I said NFS uses PG_private for its own purposes, and entangling the two wasn't the most fun I've had. Trond didn't like it either. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
