On Friday 03 April 2009 04:09:15 David Howells wrote: > Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Comments about PG_private still stand. > > Replies about PG_private still stand. > > It's owned by fs/buffer.c, and if the 'netfs' uses that, then PG_private is > not available. Well in theory I still think it would be cleanest to modify buffer to play more nicely with it. But maybe that ends up being harder to distinguish the 3 cases of attached metadata on the page. I don't know, you haven't posted any isofs code so either way it is inappropriate to use up this extra page flag here. Is isofs cache worth a page flag? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
