On Tue, 2022-05-24 at 09:07 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 06:36, Andrii Nakryiko > <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I still think that tools like perf being able to provide good > > tracing > > data is going to hurt due to this cautious rejection of access, but > > with Kconfig we at least give an option for users to opt out of it. > > WDYT? > > I'd rather use a module option for this, always defaulting to off . > Then sysadmin then can choose to turn this protection off if > necessary. This would effectively be the same as "user_allow_other" > option in /etc/fuse.conf, which fusermount interprets but the kernel > doesn't. Configuring that behavior through /sys/module/fuse/user_allow_other (or some other name if people have better ideas) seems like a good way to configure that, indeed! -- All Rights Reversed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
