on 2022/5/7 16:52, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 01:33:33AM +0000, xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Hi Zorro
>>
>> Since Christian doesn't send a new patchset(for rename idmap-mount)
>> based on lastest xfstests, should I send a v4 patch for the following
>> patches today?
>> "idmapped-mounts: Reset errno to zero after detect fs_allow_idmap"
>> " idmapped-mounts: Add mknodat operation in setgid test"
>> "idmapped-mounts: Add open with O_TMPFILE operation in setgid test"
>>
>> So you can merge these three patches if you plan to announce a new
>> xfstests version in this weekend.
>>
>> What do you think about it?
>
> Sure, you can send V4 of patch 1/5 ～ 3/5 (base on latest for-next branch
> please), as they have been reviewed and tested. Christian's patch (about
> refactor idmapped testing) might need more review, he just sent it out to
> get some review points I think (cc Christian).
>
> If you'd like to catch up the release of this weekend, please send your
> v4 patch ASAP. Due to I need time to do regression test before pushing.
> It'll wait for next week if too late.
OK. I will send v4 patch ASAP today.
>
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Yang Xu
>>> If we run case on old kernel that doesn't support mount_setattr and
>>> then fail on our own function before call is_setgid/is_setuid function
>>> to reset errno, run_test will print "Function not implement" error.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu<xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> src/idmapped-mounts/idmapped-mounts.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/idmapped-mounts/idmapped-mounts.c b/src/idmapped-mounts/idmapped-mounts.c
>>> index 4cf6c3bb..8e6405c5 100644
>>> --- a/src/idmapped-mounts/idmapped-mounts.c
>>> +++ b/src/idmapped-mounts/idmapped-mounts.c
>>> @@ -14070,6 +14070,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>> die("failed to open %s", t_mountpoint_scratch);
>>>
>>> t_fs_allow_idmap = fs_allow_idmap();
>>> + /* don't copy ENOSYS errno to child process on older kernel */
>>> + errno = 0;
>>> if (supported) {
>>> /*
>>> * Caller just wants to know whether the filesystem we're on
>
