Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 09:58:53PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 12:04 AM Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> Hi Ted,
> 
> I penciled a session on "Challenges with running fstests" in the
> agenda.
> 
> I was hoping that you and Luis could co-lead this session and
> present the progress both of you made with your test frameworks.

I'm starting to think that since IO has no session yet scheduled
in for this session it may make sense to make this generic about
fstests and blktests. In fact even fio has tests these days which
we should all be running too.

My point though is that I think that it may make sense to have
both IO and fstests share this for perhaps a common:

"Challenges with running fstests and blktests"

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux