On 4/21/22 8:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 8:52 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 1:53 AM Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 21/4/22 00:58, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
In a recent discussion[1] it was reported that the binfmt_flat library
support was only ever used on m68k and even on m68k has not been used
in a very long time.
The structure of binfmt_flat is different from all of the other binfmt
implementations becasue of this shared library support and it made
life and code review more effort when I refactored the code in fs/exec.c.
Since in practice the code is dead remove the binfmt_flat shared libarary
support and make maintenance of the code easier.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/81788b56-5b15-7308-38c7-c7f2502c4e15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Can the binfmt_flat folks please verify that the shared library support
really isn't used?
I can definitely confirm I don't use it on m68k. And I don't know of
anyone that has used it in many years.
Was binfmt_flat being enabled on arm and sh the mistake it looks like?
I think the question was intended to be
Was *binfmt_flat_shared_flat* being enabled on arm and sh the
mistake it looks like?
arch/arm/configs/lpc18xx_defconfig | 1 -
arch/arm/configs/mps2_defconfig | 1 -
arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig | 1 -
arch/arm/configs/vf610m4_defconfig | 1 -
Adding stm32, mps2 and imxrt maintainers to Cc, they are the most active
armv7-m users and should know if the shared library support is used anywhere.
Never seen shared library in use for flat format, so FWIW
Acked-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@xxxxxxx> # ARM
Arnd
