Re: cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/04/2022 07:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:00:24PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
>> I was able to resolve all the merge conflicts either manually or using
>> the tool wiggle, no need to rebase.
> 
> No problem.  What branch should I use as baseline?  for-next seems to
> be merged from not otherwise visible branches so I'm not sure that is
> a good baseline.
> 

Most (if not all) btrfs development happens based on misc-next which is
at https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel.git misc-next




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux