Re: cleanup btrfs bio handling, part 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 05:09:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 04:56:26PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 06:45:16AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > this series  moves btrfs to use the new as of 5.18 bio interface and
> > > cleans up a few close by areas.  Larger cleanups focussed around
> > > the btrfs_bio will follow as a next step.
> > 
> > I've looked at the previous batch of 40 patches which was doing some
> > things I did not like (eg. removing the worker) but this subset are just
> > cleanups and all seem to be fine. I'll add the series as topic branch to
> > for-next and move misc-next. Thanks.
> 
> If it helps can rebase.  And it would be really helpful to start
> a discussion on the things you did not like on the patches already
> on the list if you have a little time to spare.

I was able to resolve all the merge conflicts either manually or using
the tool wiggle, no need to rebase. Regarding the whole patchset, I'll
reply there. Right now I'm trying to merge all the easy or short series
first, from the lower layers up in case there's a need to rebase.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux