> On 5. Apr 2022, at 00:55, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 09:19:57 +0200 Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Speaking of limiting scope... >> >> Fair point :-) >> >> I see you have applied this already to the -mm tree. Shall I still move the iterator? >> The hope is to remove the 'iter' variable altogether when there are no uses after >> the loop anymore. > > I don't really understand the question. Basically I was asking if I should send a v2 with the change you suggested. > > My plan is to merge your patch with my fixlet immediately prior to > sending upstream. ok, great. Even better, so ignore my question. Thanks, Jakob
